tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7283220495340908363.post7423089844491413909..comments2023-03-21T08:25:43.329+01:00Comments on KinderWiser: The cost of not involving peopleAnonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09659288659331224548noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7283220495340908363.post-85826629502300061792013-12-04T19:19:08.456+01:002013-12-04T19:19:08.456+01:00Good point, it's probably easier to measure be...Good point, it's probably easier to measure because we can compare learning sites (speed of operational improvement) from non-learning sites, and then compare bottom lines. Inventory reduction might be enough to look at. Let's do it :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09659288659331224548noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7283220495340908363.post-17468349400840631462013-12-04T12:21:50.917+01:002013-12-04T12:21:50.917+01:00"Hard results obtained from soft stuff"...."Hard results obtained from soft stuff"....a very interesting approach which reminds me the debate, a few years ago, around the necessity -or not- to include "human assets" in the corporate balance sheets. <br />Your post is proposing a more radical approach: rather than debating about how to measure the potential value of human assets, let's measure the cost of not using them!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03977396526153649322noreply@blogger.com